Figure 1. Examples the mud grabber's business end. They can either be fitted with a pole that has a button to close the clamp or a line that uses a weight to close it. Picture courtesy of
Ricky Hydrological Company. (http://www.rickly.com/as/bottomgrab.htm)
The best reason for using these devices is you will know the area and depth that you sampled. this means that each sample can be approximately the same in size and more accurate. This does not help, however, when the substrate is too hard to sample! This was the case as even after wading into 4 feet of water the substrate did not give up much in the way of organisms. After sifting the mud that was sampled, all that was found was bits of coquina and oyster shell.
Our first site of sampling was below the dam while the tide was rising. The site we should have chosen for the grabber sampling was on the other side of the dam. It had feet of mud below the surface but by this time of the day we were all exhausted from using the seine nets. At each sample site, above and below the dam, we used seine nets to pull out organisms from the water column. It worked well too!
Figure 2. A well illustrated seine net showing each participant along with the floats and lead lined bottom. Illustration donated to the wiki commons site by Pearson-Scott Foresman Company.
The seine net used was a 75 ft long monstrosity that worked beautifully. It required but work by two to three people by wading between waist to neck deep water. This became quite the entertaining challenge when neck deep water met sucking mud. Many different animals were captured so it was worth the effort. The technique behind the net is simple. Like the Grabber, you know the area of the net and as long as you walk a specific distance with each sample a specific sample size can be acquired each time. We walk approximately 150-200 ft each time sample.
Really that is the key to any good scientific process, finding a good repeatable sample size.
.png)


















